Supervisor evaluation form for employees, Monitoring and analysis (often abbreviated M&E) are separate, but related, tools for analyzing and understanding program implementation and effect. While evaluation professionals frequently have graduate degrees or other advanced education in evaluation, data collection, statistics, or qualitative research methods, there are various things your nonprofit organization can do to increase your capacity for planning and implementing good monitoring and evaluation techniques.
Monitoring and evaluation are crucial for building proof base around the needs your applications address and for assessing the often varied interventions being implemented to address the issue worldwide. They are tools for identifying and documenting successful applications and approaches and tracking progress toward shared indicators across related projects. Monitoring and evaluation forms the cornerstone of understanding underlying factors and the effectiveness of the response in the service-provider, community, national and international level. Monitoring is a systematic and long-term process that gathers information in regards to the advancement made by an implemented project. Assessment is time specific and it is performed to judge whether a project has attained its goals and delivered what expected based on its original strategy.
Both observation and analysis utilize social research methods to tackle systematic investigations, aiding to answer a common set of questions. Despite these shared goals, their functions are distinct. The focus of monitoring is on tracking program implementation and advancement, including application activities and procedures, outputs, and original results. Tracking focuses on both what is being done in a program and how it is being done to support management decisions and responsibility.
Monitoring and evaluation are important management tools. Nonprofit organizations (and for=profit businesses) use these to monitor progress and enable informed decision making. While some grant-makers require some type of monitoring and evaluation, the folks with whom your company works are the greatest customers of a test. By completely and honestly examining your job, your nonprofit organization can develop programs and activities that are powerful, efficient, and also a source of powerful change for your community.
Most organizations conduct performance evaluations on an annual cycle. And, that’s okay. Employees should get a formal report at least once a year to give them a sense of how they are measuring up. However, once the evaluation is the only time the worker receives feedback regarding their performance, it’s often too little too late. You ought to be providing frequent and informal feedback to employees during the year. Minimally this should occur in a quarterly meeting that’s documented. Ideally, it will occur daily. Conversations about particular projects or jobs do not count. Actual feedback implies that you are engaging the employee in a conversation about what they are doing well and what they can do to enhance. It’s a beneficial conversation, not a intolerable dialogue.
In conclusion, using observation and analysis tools to evaluate and understand nonprofit program implementation and impact offers important benefits to your organization. Consider raising your organization’s capacity for planning and executing very good monitoring and evaluation practices by becoming involved in a local chapter of the American Evaluation Association, attending a workshop at a nearby college, or speaking with a RevGen consultant about easy things you might implement that could have a positive return on investment.