Periodontal evaluation form, Monitoring and analysis (often abbreviated M&E) are different, but related, tools for assessing and understanding application implementation and effect. While evaluation professionals frequently have graduate degrees or other advanced education in evaluation, data collection, data, or qualitative research methods, there are various things your nonprofit organization can do to increase your capacity for planning and executing good observation and evaluation practices.
Monitoring and analysis are critical for building proof base around the needs your programs address and for assessing the often diverse interventions being employed to address the problem globally. They’re tools for identifying and documenting successful programs and approaches and tracking progress toward shared indicators across related endeavors. Monitoring and evaluation forms the basis of understanding underlying variables and the power of the response at the service-provider, community, national and worldwide level. Monitoring is a systematic and longterm procedure that gathers information in regards to the progress made by an implemented project. Evaluation is time special and it is done to judge if a project has reached its goals and delivered what anticipated based on its original strategy.
Both observation and evaluation use social research methods to tackle systematic investigations, helping to answer a common set of questions. Despite these shared aims, their functions are different. The focus of monitoring is on monitoring program implementation and progress, including application activities and processes, outputs, and initial results. Monitoring focuses on both what is being done in a schedule and how it is being done to support management decisions and responsibility.
Monitoring and analysis are important management applications. Nonprofit organizations (and for=profit companies ) use these to monitor progress and enable informed decision making. When some grant-makers need some type of monitoring and analysis, the folks with whom your organization works can be the best customers of an evaluation. By thoroughly and honestly analyzing your job, your nonprofit organization can develop activities and programs which are powerful, efficient, and a supply of powerful change for the community.
Most organizations conduct performance tests on an annual cycle. And, that’s fine. Employees should receive an official report at least once per year to give them a feeling of how they’re measuring up. But when the test is the only time the employee receives feedback about their performance, it is often too little too late. You should be providing frequent and informal feedback to employees throughout the year. Minimally this should occur in a quarterly meeting that is documented. Ideally, it is going to occur every day. Conversations about particular projects or jobs don’t count. Actual feedback implies that you’re engaging the worker in a dialog about what they’re doing well and what they can do to improve. It’s a helpful conversation, not an excruciating conversation.
In conclusion, using observation and analysis tools to assess and comprehend nonprofit program implementation and impact provides important advantages to your company. Consider raising your organization’s capacity for planning and executing good monitoring and evaluation methods by becoming involved in a local chapter of the American Evaluation Association, attending a workshop in a nearby university, or talking with a RevGen consultant about simple things you might implement that could have a favorable return on investment.